UNs Catastrophic Method of Food Distribution

 The aid trucks entering Gaza using the UN’s method

This is how Gazans are killed. And after that, the UN dares to 
claim that the method of distributing aid in the American 
GHF foundation’s aid distribution compounds is the 
one endangering the Gazans, and calls it (together with, 
for example, the journalist Muhammad Majadleh) “death traps.”

Do these Gazans looked starved?

What you see here in the video is the method the UN and Western 
European countries are pushing for Israel to adopt.

A Gaza Clan Leader Plans for Peace

 Yasser Abu Shabab, a clan leader who has taken it upon himself to take over from Hamas in eastern Rafah writes: For thousands of Gazans in eastern Rafah, the war is already over. This is how all of Gaza should be.

As head of the armed militia fighting Hamas and based in Rafah, he writes in an article for the American Wall Street Journal:

While most Gazans are still suffering as the war between Israel and Hamas continues, the situation is different for thousands of people in eastern Rafah - for them, the war is already over.

In this area, there are no casualties from airstrikes. There is no overcrowding at aid distribution points. There is no fear that Hamas will plant explosives in homes. People can sleep peacefully without fearing they won’t survive another day.

This should not be the exception - it can be the reality for all of Gaza’s residents. Most Gazans do not want Hamas rule, but despite their hatred for Hamas, they still fear it. Following protests earlier this year, some demonstrators were killed, tortured, and disappeared.

We have received requests from many families who want to move to eastern Rafah. We are ready to take responsibility for all of Rafah. Within a few short months, about 600,000 people - roughly a third of Gaza’s population - could be living outside the conflict zone.

Following the success in Rafah, independent zones could be established in other places as well.

We need three things:

1. Financial support

2. Humanitarian aid and infrastructure for the population

3. Safe corridors to these areas

In a short time, most of Gaza could transform from a battlefield into communities that can recover and move forward.

This is the only path to ending this conflict.

You've been lied to regarding Hunger in Gaza

Hear the truth behind the media’s portrayal of famine, exposing how Hamas

manipulates aid while the international community turns a blind eye.

Genocide of the Druze in Syria and the Media is Deathly Quiet!

 A genuine massacre takes place on the border of Israel, not of Israelis, 

but of Druze and the media TOTALLY ignores the atrocities and 

the attempts of ethnic cleansing of Druze by militias of the

 official Al Julani  government and others  who streamed in from Turkey.

British FM Speaks with Great Ignorance

 

In the above video, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy attacks, with great ignorance, the distribution of aid by the “new Israeli method” and calls it inhumane. In practice, he is supporting Hamas and does not understand that the method he demands for food distribution (UN trucks to Hamas warehouses) is the one that kills and strengthens Hamas’s objectives.

Ignorance and deliberate deception by Hamas propaganda are leading Western countries to demand that aid enter the Gaza Strip directly into the hands of Hamas – how does this work, and where is the path of interests?

Since the distribution of aid packages in the Strip began through the American fund GHF, Hamas and the UN have been fighting it every step of the way. The reason Hamas and the UN are cooperating here is shared interests – power and control.

 For decades, the UN built a corrupt aid distribution system in the Strip that operated in a systematic and well-known way. Hamas coveted this and very quickly learned to control it, turning it into one of its sources of income and one of its bases of power for controlling the population.

When the American aid fund GHF began operating in the Strip about two months ago, Hamas' and the UN’s control over the flow of aid to the Strip was undermined. They suddenly had a competitor who received support from the US President.

From that moment, Hamas and the UN each acted to discredit the aid distribution efforts of the GHF fund – it simply took the power out of the hands of Hamas. Hamas launched an aggressive media campaign against the fund and even tried (and is still trying) to harm it through terror.

The Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza systematically floods the media daily with reports of casualties (sometimes dozens a day), attributing them to food distribution by the GHF fund – something that is completely untrue. It’s simply a systematic lie that Western media outlets embrace, thus creating a reality that doesn’t exist.

For the UN, this is wonderful – the same interest. The UN wants to control the aid. The absurdity is so great that the latest claim by Hamas and the Gaza Health Ministry about around 100 deaths daily, supposedly while trying to get food, was attributed entirely to the American fund’s food distribution efforts, when in reality the entire incident revolved around aid trucks that the UN brought in through Zikim in the northern Strip – with no connection to GHF at all.

In other words, the headlines about the recent casualties that filled Western media should actually have supported the American fund’s activities – because it was the aid brought in by the UN that caused the deaths. And that’s without even mentioning that the UN’s delivery of aid strengthens Hamas, which distributes the aid to its associates and to merchants who profit from the free aid and, in the process, enrich Hamas’s coffers.

Winning Battles but Losing Minds

How Hamas exploits psychology to harm Israel from within and abroad - opinion

If we want to win – not just the battles but also the war – we must start by understanding the battlefield we’re actually on.

IRWIN J. (YITZCHAK) MANSDORF MAY 12, 2025 (Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs)

One of the most basic insights in behavioral psychology is that people are wired to respond to immediate rewards even if those carry long-term consequences. Whether it’s eating another slice of cake, smoking a harmful cigarette, or running a red light, we tend to act when the benefit is now and the price is later. If the reward feels good enough and the threat seems distant enough, we take the risk.

This is not just human nature. It’s a weapon; one that Hamas has used masterfully in its psychological war against Israel and the West over the past 18 months.

With the help of Iranian and Qatari backers, Hamas has turned hostage diplomacy into a psychological trap. The emotional appeal of bringing hostages home – a deeply human desire – has become the bait. The cost? A stronger, bolder, more dangerous Hamas, just as ideologically committed to Israel’s destruction as ever.

And the trap is working.

In Israel, fatigue from the ongoing war has begun to show. 

Reservists still show up, but morale is fraying as the burden falls unevenly across society. Public discourse is dominated by the plight of the hostages. Families appear on TV daily. Emotional appeals grip the nation. Understandably, the public pressure to “do something” grows – and Hamas knows this. That’s why, every few weeks, another hostage video surfaces, precisely timed to stoke hope, pain, and division.

The price of a deal with Hamas

Every potential deal with Hamas carries a price. And the terror organization ensures that the price is steep. Within Israel, a moral rift is deepening. For some, particularly hostage families, nothing matters more than bringing loved ones home. For others, the memory of October 7 and the desire to ensure it never happens again means defeating Hamas, even at terrible cost.

This is the heart of our moral dilemma: Two values – both legitimate – that feel increasingly irreconcilable.

Hamas is exploiting this divide with precision. One day, it offers a temporary hudna (“ceasefire”). The next, it releases a hostage video. All the while, it plays the victim: children under rubble, hospitals without power, shelters destroyed. The images are tragic – but they also serve a purpose. The responsibility, they suggest, lies not with Hamas, but with Israel.

Incredibly, many Israelis, who despise Hamas and all it stands for, fall into this psychological trap. Instead of demanding that Hamas release the hostages unconditionally, as international law requires, public anger often turns inward, toward the Israeli government. It is a striking success of Hamas’s psychologically asymmetric strategy.

The same is true in the West. There, the dominant narrative is one of Israeli oppression and “genocide” in Gaza. This narrative is a result of years of emotional manipulation and moral confusion.

Headlines show starving children and suffering patients, rarely acknowledging Hamas’s role in initiating the conflict or continuing to hold innocent Israelis captive. The moral burden shifts to Israel, while the terrorists evade accountability.

What does this all mean? First, we must take a more sober view of the reality we’re in. The moral imperative to rescue living hostages is real – but so is the government’s duty to protect its citizens from future atrocities. 

These are not easy choices. But they are not mutually exclusive either. We must stop demonizing decisions we disagree with and start appreciating the weight of the dilemma.

Second, we must recognize that Hamas is watching us, learning about us, and playing us. 

Militarily, we may be stronger. But on the psychological battlefield, Hamas currently holds the emotional upper hand. That’s how it continues to manipulate public opinion, both in Israel and in the West.

Our protests, our discourse, and our divisions have become tools in the hands of our enemy. Israelis must consider not just what they are demanding, but how those demands are expressed. 

In the West, those who value freedom, justice, and moral clarity must understand that the same tactics Hamas uses against Israel can – and will – be used against them too.

The threat is not only to Israel’s resolve. It is to the moral fabric of democratic societies that fall for the easy narratives of victimhood.

Psychological warfare is still warfare. And if we want to win – not just the battles but also the war – we must start by understanding the battlefield we’re actually on. 

UN suspends aid work in Houthi stronghold after staff taken in Yemen

 For full article go to https://tinyurl.com/yhjk3mn7

 ( Ed comment -  if this had been Israel can you imagine the hysterical reactions?) 

The United Nations on Monday said it suspended its humanitarian operations in the stronghold of Yemen’s Houthi rebels after they detained eight more U.N. staffers, affecting the global response to one of the world’s worst humanitarian disasters. 

In a statement, the U.N. said the “extraordinary” decision to pause all operations and programs in northern Saada province was due to the lack of necessary security conditions and guarantees. 

A spokesman for the Houthis didn’t immediately respond to messages seeking comment.

The rebels in recent months have detained dozens of U.N. staffers, as well as people associated with aid groups, civil society and the once-open U.S. Embassy in Sanaa, Yemen’s capital. None of the U.N. staffers has been released.

The U.N. statement said the pause in operations is meant to give the Houthis and the world body time to “arrange the release of arbitrarily detained U.N. personnel and ensure that the necessary conditions are in place to deliver critical humanitarian support” in rebel-held areas.

It said the latest detained U.N. staffers — taken late last month — included six working in Saada, on Yemen’s northern border with Saudi Arabia.

Seven U.N. agencies operate in Saada, including the World Food Program, the World Health Organization and UNICEF, along with several international aid organizations, according to the U.N. humanitarian agency.

The U.N. late last month suspended all travel into Houthi-held areas. 

The war in Yemen has killed more than 150,000 people, including fighters and civilians. The Iranian-backed Houthis have been fighting Yemen’s internationally recognized government, which is backed by a Saudi-led coalition, since 2014, when they descended from their stronghold in Saada and took control of Sanaa and most of the north.

The U.N. had projected that over 19 million people across Yemen will need humanitarian assistance this year as many deal with climate shocks, malnutrition, cholera and the economic effects of war.